Research question
The question is narrow, answerable, and visible in the introduction, method, analysis, and conclusion. A reader should not have to guess what the IA is trying to prove.
Use this checklist before asking for feedback or uploading an Internal Assessment draft. It is designed to catch the problems that usually matter more than wording: focus, method, evidence, analysis, evaluation, and communication.
The question is narrow, answerable, and visible in the introduction, method, analysis, and conclusion. A reader should not have to guess what the IA is trying to prove.
The method, model, article, source set, or investigation path is specific enough that someone can understand how evidence was produced or selected.
Raw evidence and processed evidence connect clearly. Tables, graphs, quotations, calculations, or source details are labeled and explained.
If the IA is about a broad area rather than a precise investigation, the analysis will usually drift.
Fix focus firstStudents often show the right data or sources but stop before explaining what the evidence proves.
Add interpretationGood evaluation explains how a weakness changes confidence in the conclusion.
Rank limitationsIf the first checklist item is still uncertain, use the free IA research question checker before rewriting the rest of the draft. When the question and evidence path are stable, upload the draft for criterion-level score signals and a ranked revision order.
Run the five-part stress test first, then move into a full independent IA review when the investigation is aligned.