Research question
The question is narrow, answerable, and visible in the introduction, method, analysis, and conclusion. A reader should not have to guess what the IA is trying to prove.
Use this checklist before asking for feedback or uploading an Internal Assessment draft. It is designed to catch the problems that usually matter more than wording: focus, method, evidence, analysis, evaluation, and communication.
The question is narrow, answerable, and visible in the introduction, method, analysis, and conclusion. A reader should not have to guess what the IA is trying to prove.
The method, model, article, source set, or investigation path is specific enough that someone can understand how evidence was produced or selected.
Raw evidence and processed evidence connect clearly. Tables, graphs, quotations, calculations, or source details are labeled and explained.
If the IA is about a broad area rather than a precise investigation, the analysis will usually drift.
Fix focus firstStudents often show the right data or sources but stop before explaining what the evidence proves.
Add interpretationGood evaluation explains how a weakness changes confidence in the conclusion.
Rank limitationsAfter using the checklist, upload the draft when you want criterion-level score signals and a ranked revision order. The review is most useful when your IA has enough evidence and analysis for the feedback to inspect.
Use Coursework Grade Studio as an independent review before final edits or a teacher meeting.